The remarkable economic expansion of East Asia has drew worldwide focus and sparked conversation about the nature of Asiatic principles. An actual benefit program, according to proponents of the idea, has underpinned the extraordinary economic progress of this region and conditioned its ordered social and political characteristics. These assertions have drawn significant criticism, not just because of their presumptions of determinism and causality, but also because of their associations with strangeness and cultural superiority.

A larger conflict over competing ideas of civilization and exactly how cultures should be organized is at the center of the conversation over Asiatic principles. The prosperity of Asia can be attributed to rigid sittlichkeit, which emphasizes family and community needs over adult privileges, believes that adult autonomy is less important than the advancement of society as a whole, and believes that conventional culture is a key component of national identity, according to advocates of Asian values. Many of these concepts derive from Christian nobility and Confucian ideals of duty and honor.

Although there is no conclusive evidence to support an Asiatic benefit technique, it is true that some Eastern cultures struggle to strike a balance between their modern and traditional values in relationships. For instance, those who support Asian ideals and have high levels of racial stress might use their cultural traditions to aid in their struggle with bigotry. This is in line with research that suggests that those who support and are influenced by certain historical values may be more tenacious to various forms of racist tension.